Gold News

Moral hazard is catching

From LTCM to the 'Ohio Put' in nine years of easy money...

THIRTEEN YEARS AGO, the giant German industrial conglomerate Metallgesellschaft lost $1.5 billion trading crude oil futures.

   It admitted afterwards that it knew little-to-nothing about the oil market.

   The next year, in 1995, Barings bank – one of Britain's oldest and most respected financial institutions – went bust thanks to a lone trade in Singapore losing some $860 million on Japanese stock futures.

   The head office in London claimed it knew nothing about Nick Leeson's repeated strategy of 'double or quits'.

   In 1996 Sumitomo, the world's biggest copper trader, discovered it had lost $2.6 billion thanks to a rogue trader of its own. Yasuo Hamanaka hid the losses so well, it had taken him nearly a decade to build them up!

   And then in 1997, two professors from Harvard won the Nobel Prize for Economics for services to easy money. They claimed to know pretty much everything, and weren't shy of sharing their knowledge for a fee.

   All it took to make big profits, said Myron Scholes and Robert C. Merton, was a clever little formula. Oh, and a huge position in derivative contracts, gearing up tiny movements into large, volatile swings in options prices. Funnily enough, gearing up tiny movements into large, volatile swings in options prices was also all it took for Long-Term Capital Management to blow up in 1998.

   Both of the Harvard laureates sat on the hedge fund's board of directors. LTCM lost some $3.5 billion. And when the New York Fed learnt of the disaster, it rushed to put together a rescue package for the fund's creditors.

   Four companies, five years and $8.4 billion in losses. Glancing back from here in spring '07, the funniest thing is how quaint and innocent all these derivatives disasters look today – never mind how quaint they could look by this time next year.

   "The Federal Reserve provided its good offices to LTCM's creditors, not to protect LTCM's investors, creditors, or managers from loss, but to avoid the distortions to market processes caused by a fire-sale liquidation and the consequent spreading of those distortions through contagion."

   So said Alan Greenspan, then chairman of the US Federal Reserve, in Oct. 1998.

   "To be sure, this may well work to reduce the ultimate losses to the original owners of LTCM, but that was a byproduct, perhaps unfortunate, of the process."

   Fast forward eight-and-half-years, and the unfortunate byproduct of the LTCM rescue is still known as the "Greenspan Put" – even though Sir Alan of Greenspan climbed aboard the consultancy gravy-train back in Jan. 2006.

   Does his eponymous "put option" remain available today to over-geared speculators? News from Ohio says that the logic of the Greenspan Put has seeped far beyond the paper securities traded on Wall Street.

   "Do you have an adjustable rate mortgage (ARM) and worry about how you are going to make your monthly mortgage payment once the loan enters the adjustable phase?" asks the Ohio Housing Finance Agency (OHFA) on its homepage.

   "The Opportunity Loan is a refinance program that provides an affordable 30-year, fixed-rate financing alternative to borrowers who feel their current loan does not fit their financial circumstance," the OHFA goes on.

   The loans, available from Monday, 2nd April, seem to represent some kind of breakthrough in state-sponsored aid to over-geared speculators. (Vermont's housing finance agency will also help with refinancing, but only on qualifying mobile homes.)

   Who's being saved from themselves here isn't quite clear. Subprime homebuyers couldn't get a sensible home-loan even before credit standards were tightened in the face of the subprime collapse. Whereas the mortgage lenders, on the other hand, are dreading a further surge in delinquency rates and a further collapse in unsold inventory prices. The moral hazard of stalling foreclosure can only buy time.

   Still, Ohio's new Opportunity Loans carry a fixed interest rate of 6.75%. Borrowers earning up to 125% of their county's median income will be able to apply. And why not? "Ohio leads the nation with 11.32% of sub-prime loans in foreclosure and 3.38% of all housing loans in foreclosure," as Martin Hutchinson notes for BreakingViews.com.

   The other 54 housing finance agencies in the United States are no doubt tracking Ohio's fortunes closely. Moral hazard is catching, remember. Just ask Ben Bernanke! He caught it from his ex-boss.

   "The principal policy issue arising out of the events surrounding the near collapse of LTCM is how to constrain excessive leverage," said the President's Working Group on Financial Markets in April 1999. Often referred to as the Plunge Protection Team, the Working Group fretted that the bankruptcy of LTCM "could have potentially impaired the economies of many nations, including our own" if the Fed hadn't stepped in so ably and so quickly.

   Leverage since then, however, has merely switched markets – and swollen – rather than receding again. First it poured into margin accounts for private day traders...and then it sloshed into houses that no one could afford without exploding ARMs and neg-am mortgages.

   There's nothing to fear, of course, for as long as the money keeps flowing. The Fed will underwrite your chosen excess. Move tables if you must, but please – do keep gaming.

   And besides, "leverage in most hedge funds is generally much less than is true for most large banks and securities firms," as the professors of the Financial Economists Roundtable put it just after the LTCM collapse. So why fret about the hedge funds when the banks and brokers are so even more heavily geared? And why fret about the banks and brokers now that low-earning homebuyers owe six, seven or more times their gross income?

   "All this takes us to a rather disturbing bi-modal endgame," writes Stephen Roach of Morgan Stanley in a note – "the bursting of the proverbial Big Bubble that brings the whole house of cards down, or the inflation of yet another bubble to buy more time.

   "The exit strategy is painfully simple: Ultimately, it is up to Ben Bernanke – and whether he has both the wisdom and the courage to break the daisy chain of the Greenspan Put."

   So far, no dice. Dr. Bernanke has yet to face expiry or exercise, in fact. His predecessor's undated promise to Wall Street has now been extended to Main Street as well.

   But with Dollar interest rates up at 5.25%, there are 17 baby-steps between here and the "emergency" rate Greenspan imposed in response to the Tech Stock collapse. How low might Bernanke now go?

Adrian Ash is director of research at BullionVault, the physical gold and silver market for private investors online. Formerly head of editorial at London's top publisher of private-investment advice, he was City correspondent for The Daily Reckoning from 2003 to 2008, and is now a regular contributor to many leading analysis sites including Forbes and a regular guest on BBC national and international radio and television news. Adrian's views on the gold market have been sought by the Financial Times and Economist magazine in London; CNBC, Bloomberg and TheStreet.com in New York; Germany's Der Stern; Italy's Il Sole 24 Ore, and many other respected finance publications.

See the full archive of Adrian Ash articles on GoldNews.

Please Note: All articles published here are to inform your thinking, not lead it. Only you can decide the best place for your money, and any decision you make will put your money at risk. Information or data included here may have already been overtaken by events – and must be verified elsewhere – should you choose to act on it. Please review our Terms & Conditions for accessing Gold News.

Follow Us

Facebook Youtube Twitter LinkedIn

 

 

Market Fundamentals