Gold News

Speculating Against Bonds

If you fear inflation, then selling T-Bonds short looks wise – but speculative – move...

BACK IN THE FALL of 2008, writes Terry Coxon in The Casey Report, the US Federal Reserve responded to the Lehman bankruptcy by igniting a rapid expansion in the money supply.

The Fed did this because, in its eyes, the immediate and obvious menace to the economy was a deflationary collapse, with one giant bankruptcy threatening to breed another. And so the Fed went about its task without compromise. The US monetary base more than doubled in less than a year, and the public's M1 money supply (checkable deposits plus hand-to-hand currency) jumped by 20%.

To some investors, including many of the editors here at Casey Research, the Fed's policy seemed to guarantee price inflation sooner or later. Which, when it arrived, would mean higher interest rates and falling prices for long-term bonds, including government Treasury debt.

Put another way, as a speculator would say, when the time comes, a lot of money can made by selling T-bonds short.

That "sooner or later" is a nearly useless foresight, however. And so far as Treasury bonds were concerned, the fear brought on by the bursting of the housing bubble, tumbling stock prices, the near-death experiences of large financial institutions, and the well-publicized bailouts of public companies trumped any concerns about inflation somewhere in the future.

The compelling desire, especially among institutional investors, was to escape default risk, and that meant buying Treasuries. Inflation was a hypothetical event that could be dealt with later.

For investors who've followed the inflation-vs.-deflation debate and who've come down on the side of inflation, shorting Treasuries still looks like a sure thing – and it has looked that way for the last two and a quarter years. But for investors who acted sooner rather than later, results have been disappointing. Every time rates started to rise, bad news from somewhere would revive fears of everlasting recession, a new wave of defaults, or a tumble into the deflationary abyss. Housing prices would take another step down. The reported unemployment rate would stall or rise. The specter of a default in the sovereign debt of a European country would reappear. And every time, whatever the problem, it would stimulate flight-to-safety demand for US Treasury securities. So there was no sustained rise in T-bond yields.

Shorting an investment has costs. In the case of a bond, even if the price stands still, the cost of maintaining a simple short position is the difference between the yield on the bond (which the short-seller must pay) and the yield on the cash that is credited to the short-seller's account. You can't dodge that cost by using futures, options, or an exchange-traded fund. Regardless of how the instrument is put together, the performance will reflect the cost of a simple short sale. So while the investor who bet on rising T-bond rates as soon as the Fed turned on the printing press didn't get whacked by the behavior of bond prices, he did suffer a substantial, ongoing leakage.

If you were one of the earlier investors, you may have already thrown in the towel. With the meter running, being early doesn't feel much better than being wrong. But I believe that the mere passage of time plus the accumulation of inflationary forces (also known as "stimulus") has stacked the deck in favor of shorting Treasury bonds as a timely move. Later is now. Here are the reasons why...

The government has actually done what it said it would do. It has run trillion-Dollar-plus annual deficits, and it has bloated the M1 money supply. (That's the accumulation of inflationary forces.)

With QE2 (the second round of money creation and attempted interest-rate suppression), the Federal Reserve will be doing more of the same at least into the middle of 2011. And with the current federal budget plans, the Treasury also will be continuing on the path it set upon late in 2008.

Inflation is starting to look overdue, which increases the chance that it's not too far away. The effects of money creation don't follow a tight schedule – moving more like a jitney than a metronome. But on average, a burst of money creation will have its peak effect on economic activity 9 to 18 months later, and the peak effect on price inflation may not show up until a year after that. It's now two and one-quarter years since the monetary burst began.

The stock market has been doing what it usually does before economic activity starts picking up – it's been rising.

Does this add up to a sure thing of rising yields and falling prices for Treasuries in 2011? No. But it does stack the deck, which is all a speculator can ask for.

If a rise in T-bond rates is what lies in the near future, there are three ways it might play out...

  1. The first is a gradual but persistent rise. As the economy recovers, so does the demand for loans, so interest rates on all types of credit instruments, including T-bonds, also rise. And as the fears of 2008 and 2009 become more distant, the public leans more and more toward spending the excess cash the Federal Reserve has created, so inflation picks up. And keeps picking up. So interest rates keep rising.
  2. The second possible pattern is a sudden jump in interest rates as investors seek to dump Dollar-denominated bonds. The triggering event might be a new war that guarantees even bigger federal deficits or an announcement from the Federal Reserve that it is considering QE3. As we've seen with the serial sovereign debt crises in Europe, a flutter from any not-so-white swan can set things off.
  3. And, of course, the rise in interest rates could begin with the first pattern and then jump into the second.

The Dollar still remains the world's currency, meantime, and the US Treasury still looks like the world's most reliable sovereign borrower. By the standards of most of the world, the US still looks like a haven of stability. So any troubles outside the US that didn't directly threaten the US would bring flight-to-safety buying, which would temporarily depress T-bond rates. Or an actual default by Greece or any of the other popular candidates for sovereign bankruptcy would, for a while, reverse the rise in Treasury bond yields. A major war that the US stayed out of (if you can imagine such a thing) would have the same effect.

Any such setback for short-sellers of Treasury bonds would be short-lived. The reason for expecting a rise in rates isn't the events that lie ahead. It is the money creation and the deficits that have already occurred.

The most efficient and reliable way to speculate on rising interest rates is something most investors don't want to do – use the futures market. If you do take that route, I suggest shorting the 10-year T-bond. That's the maturity the Federal Reserve is targeting with QE2. There is no better way to boost your odds than to short the bond whose price the government is trying to support. The fire-and-forget strategy would be to deposit sufficient margin (as required by the particular broker you trade through) to keep your position open even if the rate on the 10-year bond falls back to 2.4% – which is the low since 2007. That's the simple and cautious approach. It would limit your leverage, but it also might improve your sleep patterns.

A more convenient way to speculate on rising interest rates is to use the Rising Rates Opportunity 10 ProFund, which is a mutual fund that tries to emulate a non-leveraged short position in Treasury bonds. Such funds have an unavoidable shortcoming, however. Because maintaining a 100% short position [Ed.: meaning that the fund owes Treasury bonds, and is profiting from the gap between where it borrowed and sold them with the price where it will then buy them back and return them to the lender] isn't easy when capital is flowing into or out of the fund every day. This may make an investment in fund shares more profitable or less profitable than a short position in the futures market that you establish for yourself. It adds another element of uncertainty, like play in a steering system. That's a flaw, but for an unleveraged fund, I wouldn't rate it as a disqualifying flaw since, as I want to make unmistakable, we're talking about a speculation.

Get the safest gold at the lowest cash prices - no derivatives, no default risk - using BullionVault...

Doug Casey is a world-renowned investor and author, whose book Crisis Investing was #1 on the New York Times bestseller list for 29 consecutive weeks, a record at the time.

He has been a featured guest on hundreds of radio and TV shows, including David Letterman, Merv Griffin, Charlie Rose, Phil Donahue, Regis Philbin, NBC News, and CNN; and has been the topic of numerous features in periodicals such as Time, Forbes, People and the Washington Post.

His firm, Casey Research, LLC., publishes a variety of newsletters and web sites with a combined weekly audience in excess of 200,000, largely high net worth investors with an interest in resource development and international real estate.

See full archive of Doug Casey articles

Please Note: All articles published here are to inform your thinking, not lead it. Only you can decide the best place for your money, and any decision you make will put your money at risk. Information or data included here may have already been overtaken by events – and must be verified elsewhere – should you choose to act on it. Please review our Terms & Conditions for accessing Gold News.

Follow Us

Facebook Youtube Twitter LinkedIn

 

 

Market Fundamentals