How and where best to store your physical Gold Bullion...
HERE AT CASEY RESEARCH, write the editors of Big Gold in a special report, our task is to accurately forecast trends in the gold market, do it early, and help investors profit from what we've found.
Without claiming infallibility, we've gotten it right more often than not, and by distinctly profitable margins. But research to anticipate what to expect is the easy part. It's the when-to-expect-it-to-happen that's tricky, and waiting for a predicted trend change or crisis sometimes can test our confidence.
The crisis we warned about years ago is now here, and its arrival has altered many of the rules for investing. And if you're reading this report, you probably followed our earlier advice – or worked it out for yourself – and have accumulated a nice-size crisis insurance policy in the form of physical gold.
Now you need to decide what to do with that stash of Midas cash.
Your Gold Investment may have been born in a corner of your sock drawer, but perhaps now it's stress-testing an attic rafter. Unlike Gold ETFs and Gold Mining shares resting digitally in your brokerage account, physical gold brings with it questions of space and place: how and where to store it.
As to the how, the most common methods for storing physical gold will seem obvious: Concealment, a home safe, or a bank safe deposit box. For Gold Coin owners, we at Big Gold recommend use a home safe because:
- it keeps the gold under your immediate control; and
- it eliminates any risk that storage at a bank carries.
Emergencies don't schedule themselves bankers' hours; if a "bank holiday" occurs, access to a safe deposit box will be lost when it's needed most; and a court can order the seizure of its contents, or the IRS can freeze your assets.
So that's it? A one-size-fits-all storage solution? Well no, not quite.
As your gold holdings grow, or if you already own sizable weight or are considering a large purchase, keeping all your golden eggs in one steel-and-combination-lock basket may not be the right solution. As we encourage above, having some gold in your immediate control assures that you can see yourself and your family through any calamity.
But now ask yourself: can I keep a secret and not discuss it with anyone? Loose lips could lead to a late-night, ski-mask-clad and armed visitation. How about the "security" company that installed the safe – how tight are their lips?
Further, keeping large amounts of gold in your possession exposes you to a latent threat: political risk. Or in the water cooler jargon, a "government gold grab".
Think it won't happen in the good ol' U.S. of A.? Consider the surge of government pushiness over just the past six months. The US government has usurped the free market by subsidizing entire industries and embarking on mega-dollar "stimulus" spending schemes, committing trillions to its efforts – money it doesn't have and must borrow or print.
With tax receipts falling off and government debt exploding, the government's hunt for revenue could lead to increasingly desperate measures. We've seen the 1933 black-and-white version of this script, in which the plot develops into a presidential diktat forcing delivery (confiscation) of gold owned by private citizens to the government in exchange for compensation at the price it finds most convenient. Will the temptation again prove too great? We don't know. What we do know is that once the credits roll, it's too late to start preparing.
So the final storage question must be confronted: where should your gold be stored?
One fundamental rule of investing that hasn't changed is diversification, and the principle applies to the locations you choose for storing gold bullion. Follow the principle where it leads, and you find yourself thinking about "internationalizing" your gold by holding some of it in another country. But it should be the right country.
So exactly where is where? The answer is the safest country with the most secure facilities: Switzerland. Yes, still Switzerland.
For our money (or rather gold!), we can't think of a country with a stronger legacy of respect for private property. The country traces its formation back to 1291, and the first Swiss Confederation was formed in 1353. Complete independence came in 1648, when the Treaty of Westphalia recognized the final separation of Switzerland from the Habsburg Empire.
Over the 361 years following the treaty, Switzerland has maintained its neutrality and shunned foreign military entanglements. Now that's shock and awe! The country's domestic politics are also characterized by stable, non-intrusive government. Such habitual civility, together with Switzerland's long tradition of respect for individual privacy, has kept this small, largely alpine country atop the list of the world's most trusted safe havens. (To read our full report on Swiss depositories, go to Casey Research here...)
Of course, the global financial and economic crisis has recently found its way into Eastern Europe, and the troubles brewing there center on the Swiss currency, the Franc. The apparently dire situation led economist Arthur P. Schmidt to predict that Eastern Europe's difficulties would pour over disastrously into Switzerland. His predictions grabbed the headlines and a bit of attention.
So, in keeping with the Casey motto of "Intensely Curious, Focused on Facts," we dug behind the headlines. Here's the big nothing we found.
Engaging in a carry-trade-like gamble, individuals and businesses in Poland, Ukraine, Croatia, Hungary, Latvia, and Belarus borrowed heavily in Swiss Francs, attracted by low interest rates. They crossed their fingers for trouble-free repayment as, for a while, their currencies strengthened against the franc. But that strength didn't last.
The global economic slowdown hit Eastern Europe hard, and their currencies fell sharply against the Swiss franc, turning mortgages and other franc-denominated debts into horrible burdens. Said fingers are now doing a lot of pointing at who's to blame. The size of the problem, according to Schmidt, is 230 billion Swiss Francs (US$200bn), and the difficulty of collecting on the loans supposedly threatens Swiss banks with huge losses that could bankrupt the country. Schmidt refers to Iceland's recent national bankruptcy as a model.
We don't blame him for trying, but the report incorrectly assumes that all the Swiss Franc loans to Eastern Europe originated at Swiss banks. They didn't. In fact, it's banks in Austria that have the greatest exposure to Eastern Europe. That's why, the day after the headlines, Credit Suisse released a report citing the latest figures from the Swiss National Bank that show Swiss bank loans to Eastern Europe totaled just SF33 billion (US$28.7B), or 6% of Switzerland's GDP. In contrast, Iceland's banks had lent over 1,000% of GDP.
Our conclusion: we see no evidence of an impending banking crisis or national bankruptcy in Switzerland. Heidi is safe.