Gold investing – emotional safety blanket or rational diversification...?
PROPER INVESTING experts are sure of two things, writes Adrian Ash at BullionVault.
First, you need to be diversified. No single asset works every year. Second, you should plan for lower returns ahead. Because the big gains of the 1980s and 1990s will not return. As the last 10 years prove.
Now, you can't doubt the first point. Not even gold investing in 2001 meant you could in fact see the future (whatever we might tell everyone we meet today). But if you're adding to your retirement savings, you might want to beware that second claim.
Source: BullionVault via CRB, LBMA, NAREIT, NYU Stern, St.Louis Fed
Total annual returns, US Dollars, before expenses & tax
REITS = FTSE Real Estate Investment Trusts
S&P = S&P 500 equity index
CCI = CRB Continuous Commodity Index
Corp = Barclays Aggregate US Bond Index
Trsy = 10-year US Treasury bonds
Cash = 3-month Treasury bills
The idea is simple enough. Our patchwork quilt above looks a lot like the more famous Callan Periodic Table (well, famous to finance nerds and investing professionals). It compares the annual returns on a selection of assets. In the case of the Callan Table, those assets are mostly stock-market indices, split into emerging markets vs. Europe vs. a range of thinly sliced US segments (Russell 2000 Growth anybody?).
But while that's useful, perhaps, for equity-fund investing, there are lots of other things which both private savers and the professional investors supposed to be working for them also buy. What about commodities, real estate, gold, cash or T-bonds?
Now, as you can, and just like the people Callan say – as well as more finely-sliced examples, such as Frank Holmes at US Funds ranking the different tradable commodities – "The Table highlights the uncertainty inherent in all capital markets.
"Rankings change every year."
There are broad patterns over time, however. No asset class makes #1 for more than two years running, for instance, not in the 35 years of data we've crunched. (More on the full table next week.) Most recently, and with the calls for a gold bear market in 2013 growing louder each day, it's also notable that:
The upshot? Going forwards, no idea. But looking at that "poor returns ahead" warning, it only gains credence from the past decade if you ignore gold. Which is of course what most packaged-finance promoters do. They might well ignore real estate and commodities as well.
Investing money evenly split however between US equities, investment-grade corporate bonds, Treasuries, cash, gold, commodities and real estate would have returned 6.5% per year on average, over and above inflation, since the start of 2003. Even if you'd avoided miserable gold all through the 1980s and '90s, you would still have made only 5.4% per year during those go-go decades.
Including gold, in fact, the last decade's returns stand very nearly two full percentage points better than the average real return since 1977 (again, pre-tax but post-inflation, and excluding trading costs). At 4.6% per annum, that 35-year average also sneaks ahead of the average return if you had avoided gold too, at 4.4%.
"Gold is the equivalent of a financial teddy bear," as one UK fund manager never tires of saying. And saying – and again. People cling to it, in short, for emotional support instead of rational reasons. But the patchwork quilt of a diversified portfolio is no mere safety blanket. And it's warmer still if you add gold to your color scheme.
Please Note: All articles published here are to inform your thinking, not lead it. Only you can decide the best place for your money, and any decision you make will put your money at risk. Information or data included here may have already been overtaken by events – and must be verified elsewhere – should you choose to act on it. Please review our Terms & Conditions for accessing Gold News, RSS links are shown there.