You're either for or again, dumb or smart...

In an UNUSUALLY stark separation, the smart money and the dumb money seem to be taking leave of one another, writes Bill Bonner in his Diary of a Rogue Economist.

Last week, the news seemed especially felicitous. Stocks moved higher on a wave of positive jobs data and opinion surveys.

The Dow now stands within 500 points of a new all-time high – which would signal a revival of the bull market that began in March 2009...or August 1982, depending on how far back you want to trace it.

Remember, few investors – unless they are lucky or very well-advised – make money trading in and out of small market moves...or by choosing stocks that turn out to be Apple or Amazon.

Instead, they get in at the right time...and stay in...allowing the "primary trend" to take them where they want to go. The primary trend has taken stocks on the Dow from under 1,000 in 1982 to 26,000 today.

And today, many investors expect that trend to continue. They think the economy is strong and that it should get better. After all, that's what the President of the United States says.

Who would know better than he?

But Bloomberg's Smart Money Flow Index tells us that the pros have been getting out for the last six months.

And last week, Roubini, Tepper, Dalio, and Gundlach – a whole gaggle of gurus – announced that they were turning bearish; the end of this credit boom is coming, they say. Perhaps soon.

Of course, you never really know which is the smart money and which is the dumb money until after the future reveals itself.

But our guess is that the smart money will turn out to be the money on the sidelines. A further guess is that the dividing line – between smart and dumb – will run through politics, where passionate intensity is running unchecked.

"I have never seen people get so emotional about politics," says a long-time friend who's come to Ireland to visit.

"In some places, if you dare to say something nice about Trump, they hate you immediately. In other places, if you dare to criticize him, they hate you."

Many investors are sure things are getting better all the time – "beyond full employment"...4% GDP growth...China is going to buckle – all under the watchful eye of the commander in chief.

Others are sure it is all little more than reality TV: contrived, manipulated, and ultimately, phony.

Here at the Diary, we take no interest in politics...except to despise it. Money is our beat here.

But today, politics exerts a rare and pernicious pull on the money world, like a dark star tugging a planet to its death.

The US government is the largest player in the financial markets. It is the biggest spender.

Its budget policies stimulate or stifle the economy. Its bank – the Fed – fiddles the money supply and the cost of credit. And all of a sudden, under the leadership of reality TV star Donald J.Trump, the government is doing remarkable things.

It is increasing budget deficits, when traditional economists claim it should be cutting them. And it is launching a war on trade, when only a quack economist – trade advisor Peter Navarro – believes it can pay off.

It is emptying its vaults and granaries, when the old-timers insist it should be saving for the hard times ahead.

"It's bad enough that deficits are increasing this late in the cycle, but we are increasing taxes and raising interest rates," says Jeffrey Gundlach, founder of investment firm DoubleLine Capital.

It is a "suicide mission," he adds. "This will put further pressure on the deficit and create a self-reinforcing cycle of higher debt and higher rates."

We are also in the early stages of a trade war. Mr.Trump believes global trade is a win-lose contest. You win, he thinks, by tough, "art of the deal" negotiating, making your opponent lose.

Last week POTUS sent out a tweet:

"Our markets are surging, theirs are collapsing..." he crowed.

But trade is not a win-lose deal. It's win-win. And it's these win-win deals that are at the heart of capitalism, progress, and civilization. Turning trade into a win-lose deal guarantees that both sides will slide backwards.
 
Trade barriers raise prices. Higher prices mean higher inflation rates and higher interest rates. Higher interest rates mean the feds will have to pay more to finance their higher deficits, which the very same POTUS has given us.

Last month, the feds borrowed $214 billion. They spent $433 billion, of which $32 billion was on interest on the national debt.

In other words, half of what they spent was borrowed. And as interest rates rise to the Fed's target, that $32 billion will turn into $50 billion a month. Annualized, that's $600 billion a year – or approximately two months' worth of tax receipts.

And when the next recession comes...watch out.

Deficits will widen from $1 trillion to $2 trillion. The government debt will soar to $30 trillion. And the interest – at 4% – will take up tax receipts from January through April.

It's as if a kind of financial anarchy had been loosed upon the land. No one knows exactly what to make of it...or what to expect.

But as their uncertainty increases, their convictions harden...

One side believes we are headed to Heaven and buys. The other sees Hell plainly written on the ticket and sells.

We will see where we end up.