The true weakness of confidence in global currencies today...
WE CAN ONLY agree with economic historian Professor Kenneth Rogoff that Greece should have defaulted some time ago, writes Julian Phillips at the GoldForecaster.
Despite all the current efforts, Greece will default and contagion will result in a global, banking crisis, we believe. Even if we're wrong, the mountains of money that will be created and poured into the debt hole will benefit gold and Silver Prices. The Greek debt crisis is about stemming the spread of bank runs, the breakdown of the other PIIGS countries debt situation, and potentially the fragmentation of the Eurozone. We're on the brink.
In the last month, we have seen global market confidence buckle in the face of slowing growth and what may already be a recession. This is not the time that poorer nations can use falling cash flow to repay mountains of debt. Talk of a 50% haircut on Greek debt should be lifted to as high as 60% to 70% for Athens to be able to manage its remaining debt in light of future, tax-revenue cash flows.
To get a handle on the Eurozone debt crisis we have to imagine that each nation is an individual. If an individual is bankrupt an offer of compromise is often made for 50% of the debt to be written off. Such a haircut is a 'managed default'. The banks that have to take a haircut see their balancesheets drop by this amount, often making the asset-to-liabilities ratios which they have to maintain a proportionately greater pressure, too. If the default is large enough, this reduces the amount the bank can lend and often puts it in a dubious financial position, bringing its own creditors down upon it.
With the global banking system so interwoven, the spread of such fears reaches far and wide. We saw this last week in the downgrade of Societe Generale and Credit Agricole, two of France's largest banks, because of their exposure to Greek debt. If the Eurozone crisis finds other nations following Greece, then expect much more of this type of downgrade.
At this stage it doesn't matter which way the crises go. Confidence has fallen worldwide in government debt situations and the banking industry, with fears of more to come. The very fact that the developed world is in the financial state it is, has caused the fall in confidence. If the Greek situation leads to a convincing bailout, the weaknesses in the Eurozone will still remain.
Confidence in the Euro has fallen and won't return to the previous year's levels. With money fleeing the Eurozone, it only found the Dollar as an alternative, as the much smaller Swiss Franc and Japanese Yen markets have ceased to be safe-havens, thanks to their central banks intervening to weaken those currencies. This left the 'tree trunk' of the currency system, the US Dollar, as the only really liquid place to go. But this was not because of any value that could be retrieved, rather because it's the only remaining currency that remains standing under pressure.
Right now the Euro is gaining against it, as the world hopes that Greece will get a sufficient bailout. But tomorrow it could weaken again. As to the Dollar, its debt crisis is more severe, but not as immediate.
Now stand back a pace and ask: "Can we have confidence in the value of the Dollar, the Euro, the Yen, the Swiss Franc or the British Pound?"
We all appreciate that their values have fallen, but we have to use them as the only available way of paying for things. Do we believe that the governments of these countries are capable of restoring any inherent value in these currencies? Are their structures and that of national balance sheets solid enough to want us to hold our wealth in them? If your answer was not as positive as it was four years ago, you have a measure of how their values have suffered. Looking forward, do you believe that your confidence in these stores of wealth will grow to the extent you want to hold them, or will you do so with a careful eye on them, preferring an alternative, but not being so certain where to go?
What has floated to the top of national priorities for currencies is a global need to have international prices – for the exports of goods from those nations – retain their global competitiveness. This means a persistent weakening with the rest of the world's currencies following the weakest. In itself this guarantees dropping values for all global currencies. There's nothing to be gained through a strong currency over time. This structural shape of currencies is not likely to change. In fact, it's likely to produce more and more financial discord in foreign exchanges. Price competition through exchange rates has to destroy value slowly, but surely.
We may be tempted to see the debt crises as a short-term problem, but as the world's leaders agree, they're scaring the world and threatening global financial stability. So this isn't a case of the passing flu; it describes a congenital weakness that needs a structural solution. Nowhere can we see evidence of structural reforms likely to shore up confidence and repair the global financial system. The system is flawed and most expect such crises to persist for the foreseeable future.
So why not just write off the entire world's toxic debt, print the equivalent amount of money to fill the holes and start all over again? After all if you look back at the Fed's QE exercise, doesn't that amount to the same thing? Well, almost. Now add to that a good dose of inflation, and debt diminishes in value and asset values rise. Well, that would destroy all confidence in the Capitalist system and money itself, wouldn't it? No, the world is locked into resolving these problems and ensuring the continued working of the global economy in such a way as to retain confidence. We've not seen such a dire financial scene since the Second World War, (according to the outgoing head of the European Central Bank) and close to the scene seen in the early 1930s. Then the answer was to massively expand the global money supply, through the devaluation of the US Dollar against gold by 75%.
We have no doubt in our minds that the global, financial authorities want a similar expansion of money for the purpose of diminishing the impact of the current crises. But they have to do it in such a way as to convince people everywhere that the system remains viable and healthy, despite such a debauching of money. They cannot do it without convincing people that money has become cheaper and less reliable. This favors precious metals.
Investors were shocked when the Gold Price dropped from $1850 to below $1600 in an almost straight line. When they saw silver drop from $40 to $28 they were even more shocked. After all, since 2005 gold has come from $300 and silver from $6, so a $250 drop and a $12 drop seemed to be huge. Since then we have seen the Silver Price recover $4 in one day and the Gold Price $60 in a day, with more recovery to come. In percentage terms, when compared to other markets, we see similar falls there and in similar percentages, but not the same vigor in recovery. The big picture confirms that falls, in most markets, were investors raising liquidity to lower leverage and protect against the falls, just as we saw in 2008. This is something market observers cannot see ahead of time. They accompany major shifts in investor perceptions about the structure of global financial markets.
Just as we saw in 2009 and onwards, the loss of confidence in global financial markets doesn't recover. In the gold market, since the pullback from $1200 to $1000, we've seen gold rise to $1910 and silver to mid-$40 area, a tremendous gain since then. What's there to prevent a similar shape to the precious metal markets going forward?
Take a look at the function of gold and silver. Gold, in particular, is an international asset and international cash. It can be used when all else fails. We saw that in the recent falls. Investors could liquidate holdings quickly and take good profits to cover losses, loans, and margin calls in other markets. Once there's a moderate stabilizing of markets, that lesson is remembered. Investment house strategists factor that into their policy decisions, realizing that in bad times, future profits lie in precious metals.
In the emerging world, the fall in precious metal prices is seen as speculators getting out of the market and giving them an opportunity to buy at prices they feel will allow for certain rises. Their faith in gold and silver remains completely unshaken by the falls, which they see as part of the ongoing suspicions about the developed world banking system and markets speculation. To them the value of gold and silver remains untouched and certain. Falls are seen as an opportunity to buy cheaply into the precious metals.
Buying Gold or physical silver today...?