Gold Mining Reserves Set to Shrink
Wednesday, 10/02/2013 20:29
Mining reserves in the ground are set to shrink thanks to lower gold prices...
GOLD MINING RESERVES owned in the ground are naturally assumed to be a fixed number of ounces,
says Jeff Clark at Casey Research.
After all, gold doesn't decay, and neither does it grow legs and move someplace else.
But assumptions are dangerous. In fact, industry-wide, gold mining reserves are likely to fall fairly significantly in the near future.
When the gold price falls, it doesn't just have a short-term impact on producers through slashed earnings and forced write-downs. It can affect the number of economically mineable ounces a company carries on its books, or even what it can mine in the future.
Gold mining reserves are determined by a combination of factors: mostly cut-off grades, metals price assumptions, and projected production costs. For example, based on a gold price of $1500 per ounce, a project may have economic ore at a cutoff grade of 1 gram per tonne (g/t). But with gold selling in the low $1300s, that same deposit may now require a higher cutoff grade, say 1.5 g/t, because the revenue earned from mining ore at the previous cutoff would be lower than the cost to extract it – a strategy that, as we all know, doesn't make a great business plan.
Higher cutoff grades reduce the number of economic ounces available for mining, especially if the gold price doesn't recover for a period of time.
Here's the average gold price over the past four quarters (through September 27):
As you can see, that's a fairly significant drop, and it has undoubtedly forced many company executives to revisit the price assumptions that were used to determine reserves. That means many reserves requiring a gold price of $1350 per ounce or higher are likely to come off the books.
This is the reason high-grade projects have better odds of survival than low-grade ones. Sure, all projects make less money when gold falls, but the higher-grade ones tend to have higher margins and see fewer slowdowns or shutdowns. In many cases, they still make great profits.
However, there's another phenomenon at work that will conspire to lower Gold Mining reserves: high grading. Many projects have both low-grade and high-grade zones. When prices fall, a company can mine the richer ore and still make money. It may sound shortsighted, but it can be the right thing to do to stay profitable and be able to survive and advance in a temporarily weak price environment.
But it does impact reserves, and maybe more than you realize...
When metals prices are low and companies focus on high-grade ore, the low-grade material is temporarily bypassed. It's still physically there, but not only is it not economic at lower metals prices, it may never get mined at all.
That's because some low-grade ore only "works" when it's mixed with high-grade ore. Even when gold moves back up to the price that the low-grade ore needed to be economic when mixed with the higher-grade ore, it doesn't matter, because the high-grade ore is gone. So it's not just gone legally, as per regulatory definitions of mining reserves, it may be economically gone for good.
Miners could return to some of these zones in a very high gold price environment (something north of $2000), but that's a concern for another day. The point for now is that many of today's low-grade zones can no longer be counted as reserves.
Most companies update their reserves at year-end and report revisions in the first quarter. If gold doesn't stage a strong rebound soon, the industry will see a significant reduction in mineable reserves.
This will have repercussions on the precious metals sector, and on us as investors. As you might suspect, some of it is negative, but it also points to an investment opportunity that we believe will make us a lot of money.
What lower reserves mean to us investors is a corresponding decrease in the value of the company. A company with less product to sell won't be priced as high as it was previously. The exception here will be the producers that can maintain strong cash flow; those that do will be the ones that hold up the best.
Watch out for companies that take a big write-down in reserves. Many producers will be forced to report lower reserves in early 2014 if gold prices stay where they are. But the Big Red Flags will be those with unusually large drops, because they may not have the reserves to keep production at the same level. These will mainly be the companies with low-margin projects, or those with low-grade material that will remain uneconomic because of high grading. If production falls, the stock will woo fewer investors.
Lower reserves = lower supply = higher gold prices. Worldwide gold production is basically flat. If we see a substantial decrease in the number of ounces coming to market as a result of the fallout from reserve write-downs and demand stays at least where it is, prices will be forced up. This is already happening, but if it picks up steam, we could see a fire lit under gold prices.
The better junior exploration companies could be big winners. Many producers, out of necessity, have reduced or even cut exploration budgets. Yet if they're going to survive, sooner or later they'll have to find more ounces. Every day a miner operates, his business gets smaller – but if he hasn't been exploring, the ounces won't be there when he needs them.
Enter the junior exploration company with a big, high-grade deposit. These companies will become juicy takeover targets, especially if their projects have strong economics at lower gold prices. Once management teams realize they're running low on ore, there will be a mad scramble for this type of asset.
Even when gold prices return to prior highs, it will take years for large companies that have cut exploration expenses to bring back all the laid-off geologists, identify and drill new deposits, and develop those that are economic.
There will only be one solution, and it will be a pressing one: buy an asset.
That's why right now is the best time I believe to buy those juniors that have robust projects with strong economics. To see what Casey chief metals strategist Louis James thinks fits just that description, see the current issue of the
Casey International Speculator...
Email us