Gold News

A Boost to GDP?

Or just the evils of government statistics...?
 
 
The OFFICIAL unemployment rate is 11%, writes Brian Maher, managing editor of The Daily Reckoning.
 
Yet we remind you.
 
The unemployment rate is but a statistic. And statistics are the damndest of all damnable lies.
 
Thus we wonder...What is the truthful unemployment rate?
 
Today we peer within official numbers, behind official numbers, beneath official numbers...in pursuit of a square answer.
 
What is the genuine unemployment rate?
 
We first pause to reflect upon the use and misuse of statistics...
 
Assume the government pays a fellow to shovel a hole. Assume further it pays him to shovel it back in.
 
In the official telling, you have just witnessed an increase to the gross domestic product.
 
Have you? Or have you merely witnessed a madness?
 
Or if the government adds one cup of water to one cup of milk...do you have two cups of milk?
 
Government statistics may infer you do. Yet two cups of watered milk are not two cups of milk.
 
And as we have argued before: Statistics are the bureaucrat's fiercest weapon...
 
For it is the government statistician who collects, sorts, analyzes, worries, tortures and weaponizes economic data.
 
The mangled data is then conscripted into the service of government policy x...or government policy y.
 
That is, the statistician is the government's roughneck, its henchman – its goon.
 
He does its bidding.
 
Without his statistics the government is a plodding doofus...a lunatic canine forever after its tail...a blinded, fumbling cyclops speared through its one and only eye.
 
But this graspless, senseless, sightless beast is an actual blessing to American liberty.
 
Explains the late economist Murray Rothbard:
 
"Certainly, only by statistics, can the federal government make even a fitful attempt to plan, regulate, control or reform various industries – or impose central planning...on the entire economic system. If the government received no railroad statistics, for example, how in the world could it even start to regulate railroad rates, finances and other affairs? How could the government impose price controls if it didn't even know what goods have been sold on the market, and what prices were prevailing?"
Indeed...in the absence of labor statistics, how would the government know when to "stimulate" the economy?
 
And how would its central bank plot the famously false Phillips curve?
 
What is more, statistics are the "eyes and ears" of government:
 
Statistics...are the eyes and ears of the interventionists: of the intellectual reformer, the politician and the government bureaucrat. Cut off those eyes and ears, destroy those crucial guidelines to knowledge and the whole threat of government intervention is almost completely eliminated.
 
That is, without statistics the government could not "govern" us as it would.
 
And to be governed...as explained 19th-century philosopher Pierre-Joseph Proudhon:
"Is to be watched, inspected, spied upon, directed, law-driven, numbered, regulated, enrolled, indoctrinated, preached at, controlled, checked, estimated, valued, censured, commanded...registered, counted, taxed, stamped, measured, numbered, assessed, licensed, authorized, admonished, prevented, forbidden, reformed, corrected, punished...drilled, fleeced, exploited, monopolized, extorted from, squeezed, hoaxed, robbed...repressed, fined, vilified, harassed, hunted down, abused, clubbed, disarmed, bound, choked, imprisoned, judged, condemned, shot, deported, sacrificed, sold, betrayed; and to crown all, mocked, ridiculed, derided, outraged, dishonored."
We might file additional torts against the business of governing. Yet we operate on a tight word count...and space is dear.
 
But government employs statistics as a highwayman employs a pistol...and for precisely the same purpose.
 
But to return to our original question: What is the true unemployment rate – if not 11%?
 
We turn to our own Charles Hugh Smith for light:
 
"As always in the wonderful world of statistics, especially politically potent ones, it depends on what you measure...
 
Everyone who digs beneath the headline numbers of employment/unemployment soon discovers a number of jarring anomalies in what the media presents as 'factual statistics'."
 
To what "jarring anomalies" does Charles refer?
 
The first is that the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) doesn't actually count the number of people who are employed/unemployed; they rely on a sampling survey of employers, which is more like an election poll than an actual measurement.
 
Secondly, they estimate the number of new businesses which are "born" and existing businesses that "die," and then guesstimate the number of additional employees this real-time churn generates. This birth/death model is notoriously inaccurate, as it ignores little things like pandemics and is often magically revised to create or eliminate hundreds of thousands of presumed jobs.
 
Here Charles scatters the statistical fogs...and exposes the deception enshrouded within:
"State unemployment offices tabulate the number of unemployment claims received and processed. These are real numbers, not guesses like the BLS estimates.
 
"These numbers indicate unemployment not at 11%...but a depression-level 21%:
 
"The BLS reported that the US employed workforce stood at about 152 million in February. With 32 million claiming unemployment, that's an unemployment rate of 21%.
 
"How then do government data torturers give us an 11% rate – Not a 21% rate?
 
"[They] ignore the 14.3 million contract/gig workers who are currently drawing emergency Federal unemployment via Pandemic Unemployment Assistance (PUA), and the 936,000 in the Pandemic Emergency Unemployment Compensation (PEUC) program."
But is 21% unemployment itself too wishful?
 
Even the 21% real-world unemployment rate doesn't reflect the full unemployment picture: previously full-time workers who have had their hours cut to part-time aren't counted in unemployment statistics, even though their employment status has changed for the worse.
 
Then there are the millions of workers who were recalled to work as businesses reopened whose employment is up in the air as the expected return-to-normal has failed to materialize.
 
And what of business owners themselves?
 
An entire class of workers has been glossed over: small business owners who have closed their businesses. Those owners who incorporated and paid unemployment insurance on themselves as employees of the corporation qualify for unemployment, but many small business owners didn't pay themselves as employees, and their status is uncertain.
 
We must therefore conclude the authentic unemployment rate exceeds 21%. Not since the greatly depressed year of 1934 has unemployment scaled 21%.
 
We must further conclude that government statistics are politicized statistics.
 
We trust them no further than we would trust a dog with our dinner...or a bandit with our wallet.
 
We trust the government bureaucrat who fabricates these statistics to an identical degree.
 
This fellow is a scoundrel, a traitor to truth, a menace to American peace and happiness.
 
He would tell you twice two is not four – if it served his interests to do so.
 
"The only good bureaucrat is one with a pistol at his head," said the irreplaceable Mencken.
 
Just so. Alas, it is the bureaucrat who holds the pistol at our heads...

Formerly an independent researcher and writer, Brian Maher is managing editor of The Daily Reckoning, the contrarian investment email launched in 1999 and now read by over half-a-million people worldwide each day.

Please Note: All articles published here are to inform your thinking, not lead it. Only you can decide the best place for your money, and any decision you make will put your money at risk. Information or data included here may have already been overtaken by events – and must be verified elsewhere – should you choose to act on it. Please review our Terms & Conditions for accessing Gold News.

Follow Us

Facebook Youtube Twitter LinkedIn

 

 

scri

Market Fundamentals