What choice does America have? Besides, it deserves the Donald...
WHAT do you get your wife for her birthday? asks Bill Bonner in his Diary of a Rogue Economist.
Here's a suggestion for the woman who has everything: Get her an oil rig.
The daily rental rate was about $500,000 in 2014. Now, you can get it for half off.
And the price could go lower. When the industry was flush and foolish, drillers put in their orders for new rigs. Those rigs are still being delivered, even though the number of idle rigs is now the highest in history.
Unfortunately, many of the companies that ordered the rigs borrowed the money to pay for them. That's what you do when it looks like the sky is the limit.
Then, when the sky falls on your head, you don't have any way to pay your loans. Borrowers default. If enough loans go bad...lenders go broke, too.
But we're not going to worry about it today. We've got other things to worry about. Big things. At least, that's what the chief economics commentator at the Financial Times, Martin Wolf, tells us.
He says our great republic is in danger of being hijacked by a "narcissistic bully." You know who he's talking about. And he says that if Donald Trump wins the White House, it "would be a global disaster."
How does he know that?
Would it be less of a global disaster if Marco Rubio, Ted Cruz, or Hillary Clinton were elected?
Fortunately, Mr.Wolf is wrong about everything. And when he quotes Robert Kagan, a war-mongering Washington insider and Deep State mouthpiece, telling us that Trump is the "GOP's Frankenstein monster," we begin to feel a warm affection arising for The Donald.
We are stoics, here at the Diary. Yes, the people may vote in a monster. (What choice do they have?) Yes, Trump may be a global disaster. But at least the voters will get what they deserve.
And if it is Mr.Trump who gets the crown, we have no real reason to think he will be a more benighted and misbegotten ruler than any of the others.
Besides, the election process is an exercise in solemn deceit.
The US government is among the oldest in the world. It works, on paper, more or less as it was meant to do. But in practice, it is as far away from the federal government of 1789 as downtown Los Angeles is from the little Mexican village on that spot 200 years ago.
For one, government has become a much bigger business. As it added to its own wealth and power, smart people discovered how to use it to get wealth and power for themselves.
Lobbyists, insiders, and the elite figured out how to get special treatment – privileges, favors, tax breaks, contracts, sinecures.
The Pentagon got weapons it didn't even want. The corn states produced ethanol consumers didn't want or need. And the Deep State – a permanent government of bureaucrats, think tanks, cronies, special interests, zombies, and politicians that nobody wants – made elections merely gestures of mass mythology.
We are supposed to believe our vote can change the course of an election...and that our candidate can change the course of history.
Like most myths, it can't be disproven. But the odds of it are extremely remote; rye whisky will accumulate in rain barrels first.
The Deep State decides important matters, not elections. It decides who gets what, for example. And its new money system – put in place by President Nixon in 1971 – makes it possible to shift money to idlers and chiselers, without even a token vote in Congress.
A rentier is someone who gets his money without providing anything in return. The game is rigged in his favor. He uses the power of the government to enforce an unfair deal.
The old rentiers of the 17th and 18th centuries held title to land – which probably dated from some ancient conquest. They "earned" their living by renting that land to tenant farmers.
The new rentier rents money. He gets it for next to nothing. And he rents it out at market rates. The system is so subtle...so clever...and so complex that even today not one person in 1,000 understands what is going on.
The common folk know something is wrong. But they don't know what. So, they turn to Trump, who promises to "kick ass"...or to Bernie Sanders, who promises to tax and spend on their behalf.
Do Sanders or Trump have any clue as to what is really going on?
Have they already made peace with the Deep State?
As for Rubio and Clinton, they were the Deep State candidates from the get-go – both promising more intervention...more wars...more programs...more this, more that...
...all of it to further the interests of the Deep State and its clients.