Gold News

What Next for “Bernankeism”?

Official figures don’t begin to give the full picture on inflation...

IT SEEMS everyone except Ben Bernanke, the US Federal Reserve chairman, can see that inflation is returning, writes Martin Hutchinson, contributing editor to the Money Morning email.

What most folk don’t see, however, is just how bad inflation will get.

At first glance, the most recent inflation statistics are disquieting, but no more. 

Bernanke would tell us that "core" consumer price inflation, excluding food and energy, rose at only 1.2% in the last six months. Overall consumer price inflation rose 0.4% in February, and has risen at an annual rate of 3.7% in the last six months. 

Even Bernanke's favorite indicator – the price index for Personal Consumption Expenditures – was up 2.7% over the last six months, suggesting that inflation is indeed stirring.

The inflation "hawks" – who want Bernanke to stop buying US Treasury bonds and raise interest rates – believe that the worst we'll see is a reprise of the stagflation-ridden 1970s, when inflation rose from 3.6% in 1973 to a year-over-year peak of 14.6% in 1980.

The reality is that the United States does not have the same policy mix today as it did in the 1970s. So there's no reason to expect the same gradual inflationary escalation, which was ultimately fixed by then-Fed Chairman Paul A. Volcker's painful – but not-too-damaging – tight money policy.

This time around, things could get much worse.

Indeed, when you look at the producer-price (PPI) and import-price indices, the picture is more alarming. The PPI has increased at a 10.0% annual rate in the last six months, while US import prices have increased at a 14.5% annual clip. 

In short, these few indicators – which may provide a more accurate advance warning than the consumer price index (CPI) itself – show inflation is already running at peak 1970s levels.

Granted, six months is a short period to review. And those numbers may reverse course and decline in the near future.

But don't bet on it.

If we take an honest look at fiscal and monetary policy, it's pretty clear that the odds favor an advance in inflationary statistics – and not a retreat. This will spark an inflation advance in import prices, consumer prices and, eventually, even Bernanke's beloved core-CPI and PCE indicators. This advance will take inflation up to its 1970s peak – and then beyond.

Even though monetary policy was expansionary and governments ran budget deficits in the 1970s, in neither case was there anything like what we have today. Interest rates have been below the rate of inflation for 30 months. As inflation takes off, that gap will widen.

Then there's the budget deficit. In terms of gross domestic product (GDP), the deficit is almost double the previous all-time peacetime peak, reached in 1983. What's more, the budget shortfall is being financed largely by the Fed: The so-called "QE2" ("quantitative easing" Round 2) purchases of government bonds account for 70% of the budget deficit between November 2010 and June 2011, and about 25% of total government spending during that same period.

Yes, the Reichsbank of 1919-23 was worse, financing 50% of Weimar Republic government spending. But that didn't result in just inflation. It resulted in hyperinflation.

Thus, the forces tending to make inflation increase are many times as strong as they were in the 1970s. That suggests that inflation's takeoff will be more severe, also. Not only will inflation rise beyond the 10% to 14% annual rates of the 1970-1980 period; it will get there more quickly, too.

At least two of the US central bank's 12-member policymaking Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) – Charles I. Plosser of Philadelphia and Richard W. Fisher of Dallas – have consistently demonstrated much sounder thinking than their colleagues. But Plosser and Fisher are currently heavily outnumbered.

And that's a worry. In fact, the minutes of the March 15 meeting of the FOMC – released on Tuesday - don't convey a sense of urgency or even a unified view about inflation. Although there was a long discussion about the potential for inflation – given the sharp increases in food and energy prices that have taken place in recent months – several Fed officials only said that their forecasts of inflation had "shifted somewhat to the upside," according to the meeting minutes.

Indeed, while FOMC members did talk about life after QE2, several Fed officials also said the central bank's ultra-low-interest-rate monetary policy may be appropriate "beyond 2011" – a stance that will almost certainly foster inflation.

As it stands right now, the CPI, PPI and import price figures suggest that we may see inflation running at 0.8% per month, or 10% per annum, by the late summer.

At that point, there will be two possibilities. 

In the first. and most likely, of the two, the Fed will drag its feet in addressing inflation. As was the case in 2004-06, it will be too slow to raise interest rates and remove "stimulus." This time around, since inflation will be accelerating faster than almost anyone realizes, it will continue accelerating, probably passing 1.6% per month – or 20% per annum – by the first quarter of next year.

In the second scenario, the Fed will end "QE2" as planned in June, concluding its purchase of government bonds. In that case, since July through September are high-deficit months, the net amount of US Treasury bonds hitting the bond markets will rise suddenly – from about $30 billion per month to about $120 billion to $150 billion per month. 

Japan – normally a large, reliable buyer of T-bonds, thanks in large part to the fact that it has the world's second-largest foreign-currency reserves - won't be there to help this time. Instead, the Asian heavyweight will be spending on imports to rebuild its shattered economy.

With inflation already a worry for bond buyers, that raises the possibility of an almighty bond market crash in the third quarter of 2011. The resulting lurch into recession might slow the rapid rise of inflation, but that's about all that can be said for it. A recession won't kill inflation altogether anymore than it did in 1974 – itself a recessionary year.

Investors thus need to take protective actions. No matter what your portfolio holds, your exit from "Bernankeism" will probably be very unpleasant. Be sure to brace yourself.

Looking to brace yourself by Buying Gold?...

Now a contributing editor to both the Money Map Report and Money Morning, the much-respected free daily advisory service, Martin Hutchinson is an investment banker with more than 25 years’ experience. A graduate of Cambridge and Harvard universities, he moved from working on Wall Street and in the City, as well as in Spain and South Korea, to helping the governments of Bulgaria, Croatia and Macedonia establish their Treasury bond markets in the late '90s. Business and Economics Editor at United Press International from 2000-4, and a BreakingViews editor since 2006, Hutchinson is also author of the closely-followed Bear's Lair column at the Prudent Bear website.

See full archive of Martin Hutchinson.

Please Note: All articles published here are to inform your thinking, not lead it. Only you can decide the best place for your money, and any decision you make will put your money at risk. Information or data included here may have already been overtaken by events – and must be verified elsewhere – should you choose to act on it. Please review our Terms & Conditions for accessing Gold News.

Follow Us

Facebook Youtube Twitter LinkedIn

 

 

Market Fundamentals