Gold News

Argentina: Rinse, Repeat

Same old yet again for failed policies...

ARGENTINA recently agreed to borrow $50 billion from the International Monetary Fund, writes Nathan Lewis at New World Economics in this article first posted at Forbes.

The currency tanked. What's going on?

It doesn't look to me like much of anything unusual is going on. This is just business as usual in Argentina. It is as Argentine as steak for dinner. It has been going on like this for a long, long time.

We might wonder why?

Probably, it is a dynamic common in Latin America: periodic currency collapse helps keep the poor under the thumb of the wealthy elite, who keep their money safe overseas. They find a natural ally in the IMF, which shares a similar apparent goal of keeping countries in a continual state of debt servitude. Everyone is fat and happy – everyone in the top 0.1%, that is.

The Argentine Peso today is worth about one forty-seven-trillionth of what it was worth in 1940, compared to the US Dollar. Hyperinflation is a sad fact of life.

At times, the currency has enjoyed a brief bit of stability against the US Dollar, its main foreign currency benchmark. But, this has rarely lasted for long. The most successful stretch was the period of the Argentine currency board, 1990-2001.

In the midst of a crisis in 2001, in which it was feared that the currency board would be abandoned and the Argentine Peso devalued, a team of economists from the US went to Buenos Aires to promote Dollarization. The Peso would simply disappear, and be replaced with US Dollars, on a 1:1 basis.

This would be a very easy thing to do, since the currency board already held Dollar foreign reserves equivalent to all the Pesos in existence. Pesos were like a "claim check" on Dollars held in reserve. They could just ask for their coats back. Since there would be no more Peso, there could be no more fears of Peso devaluation.

El Salvador chose this option, also in 2001, and it has worked well. But, the Argentine government refused this option, and instead chose to abandon the currency board and devalue the currency. It was a clear expression of what their priorities were. They like to play games.

If we look at the central bank's balance sheet, we find that base money – the number of Argentine Pesos in existence – is about 30% higher than it was a year ago. This has been a typical rate of base money growth ("money printing") over the last several years.

The declining value of the Peso indicates that this has been too much – the supply of Pesos is consistently in excess of demand, and the value falls. I am sure that a country and central bank with Argentina's history of both hyperinflation and currency boards are well aware of this. The only explanation left is that it is, more or less, on purpose.

All the public babble about foreign exchange intervention and so forth is just tomfoolery. If they were in the slightest bit serious, there would be at the very least a reduction in the pace of money-printing.

The operation of a currency board is simple:

When the value of the domestic currency is above the parity, the central bank becomes the cheapest seller of the domestic currency. The supply of domestic currency increases, alongside foreign reserves.

And when the market value of the domestic currency is below the target parity with the benchmark foreign currency, the domestic currency is sold to the central bank and the foreign currency is bought. The central bank becomes the highest bidder for the domestic currency in the foreign exchange market. This reduces the amount of domestic currency in existence (the monetary base), and reduces foreign reserves by the equivalent amount.

This is the basic principle of all properly-operating "fixed value" systems – a system in which the domestic currency's value is held steady with some external benchmark, most commonly an international currency like the Dollar or Euro, possibly a currency basket, or gold.

Most countries in the world today have a fixed-value policy. Argentina could fix its problems overnight, simply by implementing this process. With $60.7 billion in Dollar foreign reserves, and a recent exchange rate of 20 Pesos/Dollar, they could buy back up to 1,214 billion in Pesos – more than the 995 billion Pesos in existence. We know it works, because they did so in 1990, after a decade of scorching hyperinflation.

Argentina's problems, today just as in the past, are entirely self-inflicted.

Formerly a chief economist providing advice to institutional investors, Nathan Lewis now runs a private investing partnership in New York state. Published in the Financial Times, Asian Wall Street Journal, Huffington Post, Daily Yomiuri, The Daily Reckoning, Pravda, Forbes magazine, and by Dow Jones Newswires, he is also the author – with Addison Wiggin – of Gold: The Once and Future Money (John Wiley & Sons, 2007), as well as the essays and thoughts at New World Economics.

See the full archive of Nathan Lewis articles.
 

Please Note: All articles published here are to inform your thinking, not lead it. Only you can decide the best place for your money, and any decision you make will put your money at risk. Information or data included here may have already been overtaken by events – and must be verified elsewhere – should you choose to act on it. Please review our Terms & Conditions for accessing Gold News.

Follow Us

Facebook Youtube Twitter LinkedIn

 

 

Market Fundamentals