Gold News

Fannie, Freddie & America's Triple-A Rating

How the housing crash knocked a hole in Uncle Sam's credit rating...

IF YOU THINK THAT Australia's entry into deficit land doesn't eventually threaten its credit rating, let us take you back to the quiet conference room of a London hedge fund circa 2003, writes Dan Denning in his Daily Reckoning Australia.

I was in the small crowd, along his friend and author Addison Wiggin, listening to an informative speech by a US-based analyst on the "duration gap" between Fannie Mae's short-term liabilitiesand its long-term assets.

No, it may not sound that exciting. But what transpired over the next thirty minutes was a real eye opener. Because the analyst pointed out how, if you borrow short-term and lend long-term, you expose yourself to changes in interest rates. You may have to refinance your debt at much higher interest rates, while the value of your long-term assets falls.

This was a problem for America’s government-sponsored enterprises (the GSEs), otherwise known as US mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. The analyst insisted that while their assets – residential US mortgages or mortgage-backed securities issued by other lenders – only pay off over the long-term, their liabilities (meaning the bonds they issue to fund their purchases and loans) were short term.

Sure, the GSEs enjoyed lower borrowing costs than other corporate borrowers, thanks to their implied US government guarantee. But, the analyst said, they would face higher borrowing costs if interest rates spiked. If that were to happen, the GSEs would likely be unable to grow their balance sheets or earnings. And when your business is essentially borrowing money to buy mortgages, higher interest rates not only make borrowing more expensive, they also (as we've seen lately) affect the value of your assets. Higher interest rates meant death for the GSE growth model, he predicted.

This was back in 2003, remember, and for the GSEs the rest has been history. While the financial media were busy glorifying the results of the bogus stress tests last week, Fannie Mae quietly reported a $23.2 billion first-quarter loss (this followed a $25 billion fourth quarter loss). It also asked the government for another $19 billion in 'capital'. The company said “Persistent deterioration in housing, mortgage, financial and credit markets continued to adversely affect our financial results."

To his credit, the analyst in our London conference room saw all of this coming. After his presentation we stuffed a few canapés in his mouth and asked him this question:

"If what you said about the GSEs is correct, and the US government is forced to make its implied guarantee of GSE debt explicit, wouldn't the increase in Federal liabilities threaten the US credit rating? After all, you're talking several trillion dollars [at the time] in GSE debt. That would be a big increase in government liabilities."

"Oh. Well, gee. I don't know about that. I mean, if that happened it would mean...well...it would mean..."

"The end of the Dollar Standard and the end of the Dollar as the world's reserve currency?" we helpfully suggested.

"Well, yes," he chuckled. He seemed to regain his composure. "That's highly unlikely. I mean, that's a major development. It would be a big deal. That probably wouldn't happen. It can't, really."

"But isn't what you've just described exactly the sort of thing that could damage a country's credit rating?"

"Yes. But like I said, it's unlikely. I have to go."

Remember, that was before GSE liabilities exploded and the US government – through the Fed and the Treasury – piled on trillions in new liabilities to deal with the global financial crisis. Then fast forward to former comptroller of the US currency and I.O.U.S.A. star David Walker's article in Tuesday's Financial Times.

"Long before the current financial crisis," Walter writes, "a little-noticed cloud darkened the horizon for the US government. It was ignored. But now that shadow, in the form of a warning from a top credit rating agency that the nation risked losing its triple-A rating if it did not start putting its finances in order, is coming back to haunt us."

Moody's rating service warned last January that if the US government made no policy changes with regard to Social Security and Medicare, "we would have to look very seriously at whether the US is still a triple-A credit." At the time, Moody's said that "look" would come in ten years time. But we reckon with the huge explosion in US liabilities via the TARP and the budget deficit, that look may come sooner rather than later. And when it does, all bets about the value of US liabilities (bonds) are off.

Here in Australia, the three credit ratings agencies (Moody's, Fitch, and S&P) say the prospect of a $58 billion Federal budget deficit doesn't threaten Australia's credit rating. Not yet it doesn't. But don't be surprised if the question comes up later this year.  We suspect that government tax takings will be smaller than the budget forecasts. And the budget assumes the economy will have "above trend" growth of 4.5% next year. And of course, no one is planning for a government-bailout of commercial property, residential mortgages, or the corporate bond market.

Maybe all that seems a little far-fetched right now, especially when Aussie companies have been successful at raising new capital through the equity markets and the private bond market. But in 2003, a roomful of investment professionals and money managers found it hard to believe the credit quality of the US government was at risk from growing deficits. They were wrong, and those deficits are much worse now. That's the fate Australia wants to avoid.

Best-selling author of The Bull Hunter (Wiley & Sons) and formerly analyzing equities and publishing investment ideas from Baltimore, Paris, London and then Melbourne, Dan Denning is now co-author of The Bill Bonner Letter from Bonner & Partners.

See our full archive of Dan Denning articles
 

Please Note: All articles published here are to inform your thinking, not lead it. Only you can decide the best place for your money, and any decision you make will put your money at risk. Information or data included here may have already been overtaken by events – and must be verified elsewhere – should you choose to act on it. Please review our Terms & Conditions for accessing Gold News.

Follow Us

Facebook Youtube Twitter LinkedIn

 

 

Market Fundamentals