AKA promotion vs. fundamentals...

 

I WANT to try to answer a subscriber's question as clearly as I can because it really does seem to be more confusing than it actually is, writes Gary Tanashian in his Notes from the Rabbit Hole.

 

It's always made sense to me but I understand there is a promotion machine out there selling viewpoints and in the gold sector especially, it is often wrong-headed, lazy analysis using tired assumptions.

Gold has utility against inflation. But depending on the cyclical backdrop other assets can have better utility than gold against inflation. Where gold really shines is on the counter-cyclical phases when things are falling apart. Then it is unique, as money and as a haven.

 

I try hard to make the point that the gold miners often rise during inflation but if/as gold under-performs cyclical commodities and assets their bottom line fundamentals are affected because in theory at least, their cost inputs are rising faster than the price of their product. So I am not bearish on gold miners during inflation. I am bearish on their fundamentals. Big difference. Some of the biggest gains in HUI have been during times that the fundamentals were degrading. That's because the inflationist bugs are on board.

 

Conversely, some of the worst selling events happen while the fundamentals are screaming higher. Look no further than Armageddon '08, the Q4 2008 deflationary crash in everything, as gold declined but it sky rocketed vs. everything but the US Dollar and Treasury bonds. That was fuel to gold mining bottom lines and an epic buying opportunity. I equate this to inflationists giving up the ship when the inflation fails.

 

Unfortunately, a gold stock promoter will generally not look at these dynamics because they are a nuisance to the perma-bullish view. Similarly, perma-bears will not look at them either. Gold stock bears often point to the lack of inflation as a reason to be bearish on gold stocks. Wrong Way Corrigans, the whole lot of them. Which is why I came up with a little cartoon indicating the best macro fundamental conditions for the miners [generally, the larger the planet the more important the consideration].

 

 

It is also why I tell you that the moment things turn against the sector we will be aware of it and take action against it. Frankly, I don't much like being a gold bug because it means I am not feeling good about the world's situation, especially its financial and economic situation. And I don't like being

 

seen as a gold bug (I label myself that, but work with me here) because of some of the company I keep, by definition.

 

Everybody's got an opinion on gold, a metal that stirs up peoples' emotions like no other asset. Its value proposition is grounded in monetary honesty vs. a world of assets ginned up on printed leverage. But that's a low bar. Gold is a rock. It is a pretty rock that has been seen as money for centuries. It is relevant in times – like now – of incredible monetary chicanery. It is for the long-term as we unwind this Keynesian experiment.

 

But gold miners are simply companies that dig the stuff out of the ground and they do it at cost. The cost rises and falls just as the price of their product rises and falls. But when costs rise better than the product, as often happens during cyclical inflation (look no further than 2003-2008) the investment value proposition in the miners fades.

 

 

I used to call it the Crown of Thorns, the Head & Shoulders top formed after years of inflationary markets.

 

That was because the fundamentals had been flatlining or degrading for half a decade while the index rose. The fundamentals were good from 2001 to 2003 and that move was similar to what we've seen since 2018. The fundamentals tend to launch the sector. But then it becomes a cacophony of loud voices and wrong-headed rationale. So, our target is in the books and the next target awaits. But I would rather see the fundamentals stay intact or else as often noted, this becomes just another (inflated) sector.